info@dpadvocates.com
+234-814 083 0309
By

Admin

EMEKA UGWUONYE: OUTCOME OF COURT TODAY.

  Very simple! The court did not sit.   That is the simple way lawyers describe what happened. But in a more transparent manner of speaking, the judge who fixed today for trial, failed to show up. She found something more important than the liberty of those whose freedom depend on a timely conclusion of the trial. Today, it affected Emeka Ugwuonye, but all this while, it has been affecting thousands of Nigerians. DPA recognized this problem and had been aiming to tackle it as a cultural and structural problem, facing Nigeria. Like other things that have happened since his unlawful arrest and detention, Emeka experiences the problems he had suspected existed in the administration of justice in Nigeria. That experience increases our resolve to seek reforms and changes in the system.   Our members met him in court today and we talked about this. He was not disappointed. He said that he knew these things happen and was well prepared for them. We also spoke to the lawyers who strongly believe he will be out on bail soon.   The Founder sent his regards to all of you.

FOR DPA MEMBERS ONLY: STRATEGIC UNDERSTANDING OF EMEKA UGWUONYE’S CASE.

With a good strategic analysis of what is going on in Emeka Ugwuonye's case, there should be no need to panic. Things are working to DPA's advantage, so far. If the police had just threatened Emeka and refused to investigate Chacha's murder, it will be a small thing in a country where many terrible things happen. Maybe, it would all die with time. If the police had arrested Emeka on July 7, 2018 and released him July 10, 2018 and ended it there, it would have been a small misunderstanding. It might just go away. If that was it, the police might not look too bad. But God wanted the true nature of the police to come out for the world to see. So, the police had to go to the extent to fabricate a murder charge against Emeka. It became a big story. If the police had withdrawn the charges and let Emeka go, it would not be a big problem. But God wanted the police to expose themselves.   If the judge had granted Emeka bail, by now, everybody would have forgotten. But it was necessary for Emeka to be detained for this long in order for the attention of the world to be focused on the matter.   With what has happened, a small problem has become a big one. We now know how the police kill innocent people and falsely accuse them of crimes. The world would hear Emeka explain how David is suspected of responsibility for what happened to Chacha. This case will be turned into the trial of the Nigerian police. .   So, it was important to DPA for this case to take its full course. That is the way for the world is to know what is happening inside the police. Without this case, Emeka would not have been able to interview 800 inmates from Abattoir to prison.  Without this case, we would not have known how the courts aid the police in the atrocities.   This case is very strategically Important.

POOR OSINBAJO, YOU’RE SO RIGHT

The Vice President of Nigeria is right on both points he makes in the Punch article below. Social media, in a society with diminished virtue and high level of ignorance, could become a devastating weapon of mass destruction. In Nigeria, both the government and individuals  have abused social media. No one knows this better than Emeka Ugwuonye, our Founder. The Nigerian police, via a criminal Deputy Police Commissioner, convicted Emeka on social media. A corrupt official of the Nigeria Supreme Court took bribe and disbarred Emeka Ugwonye on social media. And some ignorant people also disbarred him in America through social media. They use social media to peddle lies. People who didn't finish WAEC all of s sudden became experts on how to disbar a lawyer, even overseas. The blackmailer-in-chief, Sowore and Sahara Reporters, used social media to convince the gullible that Emeka was disbarred. How can you disbar a lawyer without any court order signed by a judge of the highest court in the relevant jurisdiction? Wife beaters and scammers and Internet fraudsters ganged up to use social media to attack DPA. The Vice President is crying out now because he just received a little bit of what Emeka has suffered since the invention of social media. They already used social media to scare the Vice President from ever trying to run for Presidency. If Emeka were not a very tough person, they would have used social media to kill DPA.   Yes, we know how potently destructive the social media has been in less developed societies with high level of malcontent and ignorance, such as Nigeria. Yet, we believe that the best form of policing for social media is self policing. Each person has to regulate himself or herself.   The funny irony about the social media is that when a person embraces it the first time, he or she thinks she has become strong, powerful and influential. She becomes a tigress in her mind. She begins to bully people. If you don't return her calls or acknowledge her presence, she uses her new power to slam you.   But then the process comes a full circle. In 5 years time, she sees that her life has diminished rather than improved. The reason is that access to the social media does not automatically change what you are. If you are not solidly educated and you do not have good virtues to give out, you will all be giving out the emptiness and negativity in you. Those don't last. In a few years, you are burnt out and you return to where you are - empty, poor and without friends.   http://punchng.com/social-media-regulation-not-best-option-osinbajo/

The Vision of Emeka Ugwuonye Through DPA

After many years of active and diversified experience in America, Emeka Ugwuonye understood the direction of change in many different spheres of human endeavors.

Looking at legal services, for one, he could see that a few years from now, the current way of doing business will need to change radically. The idea that an ordinary person would wait until he is in trouble before he would then dress up, go to the office of the lawyer, sit on his upholstery to narrate his problems to the lawyer; such idea will be too outdated and archaic. The idea that a person needs to be rich before he will be able to receive justice under the law will be too harsh and too unjust for a modern society. For Emeka Ugwuonye, he envisioned justice becoming like oxygen. You don't need to be rich to breath oxygen. You only need to be wise enough to stay away from a polluted spot.

Emeka Ugwuonye's mind was no different from other graduates of Harvard of the 90s. The internet had just been introduced for civilian use. Ten years after graduation, it was obvious to him the impact of the digital revolution. As a lawyer, he was focused on how new technologies were changing the service sector he was most familiar with, which is the legal sector. In 2007, he spoke in a bar function in Washington DC about internet based interactive legal research modules. Based on that concept, he contemplated an online legal services firm. The project was shelved  because it would require several million dollars to get it off the ground.

As a Nigerian, Emeka believed in the opportunity of using his knowledge and experience to effect positive changes in Nigeria. A country of 200 million people, which is quite poor and behind in many areas, has tremendous opportunities for growth and development. With this in mind, Emeka would focus his attention on Nigeria. He has never regretted his decisions, despite any challenges.

But a straight profit driven venture did not appeal to Emeka. He needed a hybrid concept whereby he could create free public good through a commercially viable operation. DPA presented the best opportunity.

Through DPA, we have been able to ensure that an ordinary person can afford quality legal services in his moments of need. Through DPA, we have been able to ensure that access to justice has been broadened to reach more people who were previously shut out. Through DPA, a person in need of legal service is able to get quality intervention from a lawyer he is just meeting for the first time, like what is happening this morning in Benin City. (A lady summoned to a police station will meet her lawyer for the first time a few minutes before the meeting. But the lawyer will have extensive information about her and her case and she will know a lot about the lawyer. And money will not be discussed between her and the lawyer. Also, she will not be worrying whether the law is competent or not. DPA made all that possible). Through DPA, we have been able to create critical legal awareness through free legal education offered on our platforms. We can do any of these things much better.

Beyond our present levels of achievement in DPA, we see vast opportunities ahead. Through the DPA integrity venture, we are going to float integrity evaluation platforms, which will help solve one of the greatest problems in Nigeria today, which is that it is impossible to believe anything good a Nigerian tells you about himself or herself. Our integrity platform will make it very easy for you to confirm a person's resume in minutes, whether you are evaluating the person as a lover, or as an employee or as a tenant.

Indeed, DPA has lined up various ventures that leverage well with its structures. These ventures touch on sectors like the media, education, health, marketing and distribution, financial services, logistics and hospitality, emergency response system, etc.

Members of the DPA community must be aware that joining DPA is about the best decision they have made. The easy entry point into DPA is by joining the forum as a forum member. That's free of charge. Your DPA experience widens as you become a registered member.

 

DPA has an incredibly bright future, not just as a name, but as a bundle of ideas and concepts.  We want you to be part of the revolution.

The Vision of Emeka Ugwuonye Through DPA

After many years of active and diversified experience in America, Emeka Ugwuonye understood the direction of change in many different spheres of human endeavors.

Looking at legal services, for one, he could see that a few years from now, the current way of doing business will need to change radically. The idea that an ordinary person would wait until he is in trouble before he would then dress up, go to the office of the lawyer, sit on his upholstery to narrate his problems to the lawyer; such idea will be too outdated and archaic. The idea that a person needs to be rich before he will be able to receive justice under the law will be too harsh and too unjust for a modern society. For Emeka Ugwuonye, he envisioned justice becoming like oxygen. You don't need to be rich to breath oxygen. You only need to be wise enough to stay away from a polluted spot.

Emeka Ugwuonye's mind was no different from other graduates of Harvard of the 90s. The internet had just been introduced for civilian use. Ten years after graduation, it was obvious to him the impact of the digital revolution. As a lawyer, he was focused on how new technologies were changing the service sector he was most familiar with, which is the legal sector. In 2007, he spoke in a bar function in Washington DC about internet based interactive legal research modules. Based on that concept, he contemplated an online legal services firm. The project was shelved  because it would require several million dollars to get it off the ground.

As a Nigerian, Emeka believed in the opportunity of using his knowledge and experience to effect positive changes in Nigeria. A country of 200 million people, which is quite poor and behind in many areas, has tremendous opportunities for growth and development. With this in mind, Emeka would focus his attention on Nigeria. He has never regretted his decisions, despite any challenges.

But a straight profit driven venture did not appeal to Emeka. He needed a hybrid concept whereby he could create free public good through a commercially viable operation. DPA presented the best opportunity.

Through DPA, we have been able to ensure that an ordinary person can afford quality legal services in his moments of need. Through DPA, we have been able to ensure that access to justice has been broadened to reach more people who were previously shut out. Through DPA, a person in need of legal service is able to get quality intervention from a lawyer he is just meeting for the first time, like what is happening this morning in Benin City. (A lady summoned to a police station will meet her lawyer for the first time a few minutes before the meeting. But the lawyer will have extensive information about her and her case and she will know a lot about the lawyer. And money will not be discussed between her and the lawyer. Also, she will not be worrying whether the law is competent or not. DPA made all that possible). Through DPA, we have been able to create critical legal awareness through free legal education offered on our platforms. We can do any of these things much better.

Beyond our present levels of achievement in DPA, we see vast opportunities ahead. Through the DPA integrity venture, we are going to float integrity evaluation platforms, which will help solve one of the greatest problems in Nigeria today, which is that it is impossible to believe anything good a Nigerian tells you about himself or herself. Our integrity platform will make it very easy for you to confirm a person's resume in minutes, whether you are evaluating the person as a lover, or as an employee or as a tenant.

Indeed, DPA has lined up various ventures that leverage well with its structures. These ventures touch on sectors like the media, education, health, marketing and distribution, financial services, logistics and hospitality, emergency response system, etc.

Members of the DPA community must be aware that joining DPA is about the best decision they have made. The easy entry point into DPA is by joining the forum as a forum member. That's free of charge. Your DPA experience widens as you become a registered member.

 

DPA has an incredibly bright future, not just as a name, but as a bundle of ideas and concepts.  We want you to be part of the revolution.

DPA Policy Statement for October 2019

The Due Process Advocates Foundation (DPA), an international human rights and humanitarian organization, founded by Barrister Emeka Ugwuonye, has issued its October 2019 monthly policy statement. This month's statement focuses on reforming the  administration of criminal justice in Nigeria. REFORMING NIGERIA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: THE MAIN GOAL OF DPA Corruption has pervaded every sphere of the Nigerian society. The administration of criminal justice is not spared. Corruption is so deep and entrenched from the moment you encounter law enforcement personnel through the entire process. Judges determined to punish the innocent will deny you bail and subject you to imprisonment, sometimes for a period longer than would be the case if you had committed the offense. The abused in the administration of criminal justice in Nigeria is many times worse today than during the military rule. If you want to know how bad it is, look at our prison statistics. Over 80% of people in prison have no business being in prison. They are in prison because many judges actually subvert the constitution. They unconstitutionally deny people bail and leave them for years in prison awaiting trial. The only thing it will take for you to end up in prison for a very long time is that a police officer is malicious enough to accuse you, even without an iota of evidence. Indeed, it is not supposed to be so, even at the level of the police. Without corruption and incompetence, the police would be professional and ethical in the way they conduct investigation and frame charges. But where the police fail, noncorrupt and competent judges should be able to check and prevent the harm caused by police failure. What we have in Nigeria is worse failure at the judicial level. A person abused by the police is better off paying the police and settling with them than to hope that the court would rectify and correct the abuse. In fact, what often happens is that the corruption or failure at the judicial level worsens and exacerbates the harm initiated at the police level. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the judicial attitude and practice on bail. It is DPA's view that under our constitution, a judge cannot deny a person bail. The discretion of the judge is limited to the imposition of conditions for bail. As long as the judge has discretion to impose bail conditions, he or she does not have the power to deny bail. To deny bail is to deny himself or herself the discretion to impose conditions. A judge does not have the discretion to deprive himself or herself of a discretionary power granted by law. She can only exercise one way or the other a discretion lawfully granted, but not to shut himself or herself totally out of the exercise of discretion. If a judge feels that a person is not trusted to attend his trial on his own or that he is a flight risk,  such fear or concern shall not result in outright denial of bail, but rather it should be reflected in the terms and conditions of bail. Example: Omoyele Sowore's case. In Sowore's case, a highly skeptical judge still granted bail, but imposed very stringent conditions of bail that Sowore has not been able to meet. The bail conditions imposed in Sowore's case are a reflection of the judge's fears that if released on bail Sowore might not be available for his trial. It would have been wrong for the judge to have taken the expedient route of denying him bail. To deny a person bail just because you fear he might not be available for his trial is to admit that the judge lacks the ability to calibrate a set of bail conditions to allay the fear. It is the height of in competence for a judge to chose the lazy option of not dealing with the problem at all. It is a crime to deny bail just to punish the accused. It is incompetence to do so just because you lack the time, patience or intelligence to design a suitable set of bail conditions. One may wonder if there is any difference between denial of bail and imposition of impossible bail conditions. Indeed, Nigerian Supreme Court has held that excessive bail condition amounts to no bail. Yet there is a great difference between the two. When the problem is that of excessive bail conditions, you can always seek variation of the conditions. It is much easier to vary the terms of bail than to appeal against denial of bail or to wait and file fresh bail application. When a judge has admitted that you can be on bail but imposes conditions too stringent,  all you need to do is to propose convincing or acceptable terms of bail and ask for variation. In such case, the judge only needs to be satisfied that you will be available for your trial. On the other hand, when denied bail, the judge has, in fact, convicted and sentenced you and the issue is no longer whether you will be available for your trial or not. It is a mean-spirited measure of punishment for an offense you have not even been tried for. And it is unconstitutional. When it is done for any other consideration apart from an honest abidance with the law or in the interest of justice, it becomes an act of corruption. What are the factors that lead to abuse of judicial powers? There are three main reasons: First among these reasons is outright corruption - Money or other favors are given or promised to the judge if she rules in a certain way or to a certain outcome. Second reason is incompetence or lack of qualification. If an unqualified person becomes a judge, often because his appointment was a product of corruption, the tendency is to conceal the incompetence by always ruling against the weaker party, who is less likely to take any action to resist a wrong verdict. Equally, an incompetent or unqualified judge can only advance in his or her career by volunteering to favor the powerful, regardless of the position of the law. Third reason is lack of judicial independence. This could be personal to a judge or generic to the entire court or the judiciary as a whole. Evidence exists to show that judges n Nigeria could be arrested and prosecuted and dismissed contrary to the law and the Constitution. This causes many judges to fear for their lives, their liberty, the security of their jobs and other problems that might flow from the displeasure of the police or other agencies from the Executive branch of government. Many Nigerian judges face a combination of these problems and that turns our justice  system into a system of jungle justice. Massive reform is necessary to correct the problems highlighted here.   DPA Policy Statement October 11, 2019

How Nigerians fight in the social media over Emeka Ugwuonye

The attack on Emeka Ugwuonye, Founder and CEO of DPA is a clear example of how Nigerians misuse the social media. A man chastised by DPA for beating his wife or a scammer stopped from blackmailing a victim or simply a person bitter because he or she was removed from DPA forum, any of these people can get on social media and attack the leader of DPA. That is totally understandable. Indeed, some of them have added special twists to their grudges. They created false profiles with all manner of fake names such as Tokunbo Peters, and use such profiles to post every imaginable story on Emeka Ugwuonye. All this go to show the profound impact Emeka Ugwuonye has had on our contemporary society. A Harvard man returned to his country to stir up change on a very fast pace. He ignored the old standards and doesn't seem to care about petty little gossips. He stopped domestic violence. He got men arrested for beating their wives. He got online fraudsters to stop defrauding their victims. He told women to insist on registry marriage. He told his highly conservative countrymen and women that divorce is a valid option against failed marriages. He challenged police atrocities and abuse of rights. He is so smart. His intelligence, wit and boldness can intimidate and frighten an opponent. He inspires both admiration and envy. The best way to fight such a man is to hide behind a fake profile or to attack when you think he is absent. Emeka Ugwuonye means a lot of things to a lot of people. They will talk about him. That is natural. The important thing to know, however, is that those who talk bad about him will never show you any evidence. Indeed, if you ask them to show you evidence of any wrong doing by Emeka, they will either disappear or get angry or tell you what the heard from a nameless source. The fact is that Emeka Ugwuonye is an enigma and he has impacted the society in a remarkable and evolving way. You are yet to feel the full impact of the Emeka's phenomenon.

What to expect today on Sowore’s case

Sowore has since been informed that he will appear at the Federal High Court, Maitama on Monday, 30th September 2019. So, he is excited and happy to be stepping outside the walls of DSS detention center first time in 52 days. By 8am, he would pack his few belonging (his phones will remain with the DSS) and he will be taken in a DSS vehicle escorted by about 12 DSS personnel. To make sure his supporters do not disrupt anything, the DSS would alert the Abuja police command, which will send up to 30 policemen to take positions near the court premises to avoid any unruly crowd. By 8:45am, Sowore will arrive at the court, where his lawyers and friends will be waiting to meet him. But only his lawyers will be allowed to meet him briefly before they enter inside the courtroom. Sowore will not be handcuffed. Immediately the court opens, Sowore's will be called. He will enter the dock as the defendant. The DSS lawyer (a prosecutor from the Ministry of Justice) will announce his appearance with two to three other lawyers with him. Femi Falana will announce his appearance with more than 5 lawyers with him, for Defendant- Sowore. The Registrar of the Court will ask Sowore if he understands English, to which he will likely answer yes. The Registrar will read each count of the 7-count charges. At the end of each, the registrar will ask him to plead either guilty or not guilty. Sowore will plead not guilty to each count. Then the prosecutor will ask the court to set a date for trial and to remand the Defendant. Falana will inform the Court that he has filed a bail application and served the DSS. The prosecutor will admit that they have been served with bail application but that they need time to respond. The court will adjourn the case for about a week to two weeks to enable the prosecution to file its counter affidavit and for the bail to be argued. Then the court will remand Sowore. The question here is where Sowore will be remanded. The normal place to remand a person after arraignment is in the prisons (corrections now). But DSS has in some few cases tried to have a high profile defendant remanded in their custody such as Dasuki and El-Zakzaky. We believe that DSS will treat Sowore no differently from Nnamdi Kanu and since Nnamdi Kanu was remanded in Kuje, that's where Sowore will be remanded. Once remanded in Kuje around 11am today, either the DSS or the prison warders will take Sowore to Kuje prison where he will be processed and assigned to a cell and a custody. The next day he will start his medical tests to ensure he has no communicable diseases that may require him being isolated from the general inmate population. Sowore will find the prison less restricted than the DSS detention center, even though the food at the DSS is better than in the prisons. In the prison, Sowore will determine whether he will eat the prison ration or to be allowed to feed himself. Inmates on self-feeding have choice over what they eat. He will be allowed to have visitors and to call his lawyer and family through the prison welfare department. Having been in DSS detention center for over 50 days, it will be a relief for Sowore to be in prison custody from today. The DSS detention is far more isolating and restricted than the prisons. For Sowore, today marks an end to one chapter in his criminal justice experience, while it opens another new Chapter for him.

DPA RAMBO PREDICTED THAT DSS WOULD NOT RELEASE SOWORE.

It is really unfortunate that DSS worked itself into a very tight and awkward corner ever. All along, DSS was operating in apparent compliance with Nigerian substantive laws and procedures that were heavily tilted in favor of DSS and against personal liberty. And to the extent that they appeared to work within those legal rules, it was difficult to blame DSS, as they did not make the laws. 

But all that changed few hours after Justice Taiwo granted bail to Sowore. He ought to have been released once the terns and conditions set by the court were met. That was what DSS needed to maintain the appearance that it acted within the law. Having failed to maintain that appearance of compliance with law, DSS has come under increasing criticism, and rightly so. At the same time, Sowore appears more like a victim of state-sponsored persecution, and rightly so, too.

The story now is how DSS failed to comply with  court order. That takes away any merits in their case against Sowore. Many knowledgeable people are now asking why such blunders by DSS. Why not arraign Sowore before the expiration of the 45 days granted to them to detain him? Alternatively, why didn't they apply for two weeks extension of the 45 days, which would easily have been granted to them? Alternatively, why not release him and arraign him when you are ready since his lawyer has undertaken to produce him for arraignment? Any of these would have been better than the option DSS have chose to follow. It is believed that some people within the DSS deliberately screwed up their strategy. 

Anyway, we believe that DSS is just trying to get a date in court to arraign Sowore. But they were never to play that game and with everyday that passes without them either arraigning Sowore or releasing him, they run out of any moral maneuverable room left. We believe that DSS still won't release him. They want to keep him till he is arraigned. But if DSS don't arraign Sowore today, Friday, September 27, and do not release him either, then DSS has lost the game.

Our best guess is that Sowore will be arraigned today and be remanded in prison today. We don't foresee any alternative to this. Our analysis of the history and psychology of DSS leaders leads us to believe that Sowore's lawyer's decision to initiate a contempt proceedings against DSS will push them into a fierce resistance up to the point of thumbing their noses at the courts. Though that will be unfortunate, that is a reality suggested by a close study of the history of DSS. 

.

Part 2 of update on Emeka Ugwuonye: Today in court 26/9/2019

IT WAS A BOMBSHELL TODAY IN COURT. During the continued cross-examination, Emeka Ugwuonye's lawyer asked David Aiyedegbon: "When you saw the picture of the headless body of a woman, which Emeka Ugwuonye posted on Facebook on 26th of June 2016, did you recognize it as the body of your estranged wife?" David shocked everybody by saying that the legs of the body resembled his wife's and that he recognized it from the picture then. This was a bomb shell because the while fight between DPA and the police was that DPA said that the body was Chacha's body while David and the police accused DPA of lying about that.  For two years, David and the police denied the body and claimed that Chacha was alive and was sighted in Brazil and South Africa in night clubs as recently as in 2017. The first charge the police filed against Emeka Ugwuonye was for lying that the body was Chacha's. Nobody was prepared for David's answer today. If ever David and the police had accepted that the body was Chacha's, DPA would have ended the investigation since because all DPA wanted was to find Chacha, dead or alive. When the hearing was over today, David was seen outside quarreling with the police lawyers because of the answer he gave to that question. But an intelligent person can understand why he gave that answer today. David knew where Emeka's lawyers would be taking him to soon: why did the police refuse to conduct any test on the body that DPA said was Chacha's body? They failed to conduct any test which would have confirmed the body to be Chacha's. They spent two years denying that the picture was Chacha's only to suddenly admit it was. They claimed that they became aware it was Chacha's only after Jekwu confessed in May 2018. They now realized that if their only evidence that the body was Chacha's was Jekwu's coerced confession, there may be no evidence that Chacha was dead unless they accepted the theory of DPA. And you cannot accept DPA theory and at the same time be fighting Emeka Ugwuonye for advancing that theory. So, David now dies a u-turn to suggest that they base their present position on David's observation of the body in 2016. Very interesting!   DPA is very happy with the development. We have achieved our first objective which is to show that the headless body of the woman found in Bwari on May 12, 2016 was Chacha's and that both the police and David knew all along that it was Chacha's body. DPA has compelling evidence to show that the police had been lying all along and that they were covering the truth.   Well, God is good! Emeka Ugwuonye was and still is ready to go as far as necessary to bring out the truth the police is covering. Emeka allowed himself to be detained in Abattoir on July 6, 2018 because he wanted to interview Jekwu and Emmanuel and that was the only way he could reach them. Emma's family had been begging Emeka for DPA to help Emmanuel. But Emeka could not decide without speaking to Emma. So, when Emeka was sent to Abattoir, the police saw it as punishing Emeka, while Emeka saw it as an opportunity to interview these boys accused of killing Chacha, to know if they actually did it. In Abattoir, Emeka learned more about how devilish the police were.   When they charged Emeka and remanded him in prison, he was glad to go because he had a mission which would be better served by finding out what goes on there. That is why he insisted that nobody should worry about him being in prison, that him being in prison would  help DPA.   Let us be patient and strong, like the man that is leading us in this matter. He swore that a woman like Chacha should not just disappear and there would be no explanation what happened. After 3 years of lying, Chacha's husband admitted in court that immediately he saw the picture of the body shared by DPA in 2016, he knew it was picture of Chacha's body. That brings David to the same position as the Chacha's friend, whose opinion of the pictures Emeka Ugwuonye relied on to conclude that it was Chacha's body.   We hope our members will continue to follow this case.